Use cases

Use cases for decisions where intensity matters

Some groups need the vote count and the force behind it. These use cases show where quadratic voting, delegation, and transparent cost accounting sharpen the decision record.

What ties these use cases together

Nicolas is useful when participants prefer different options with different levels of intensity, because a simple vote count can hide that structure.

The mechanism gives participants a finite voice budget, charges quadratic costs for stronger vote intensities, supports delegation, and keeps the decision record explicit.

How to choose a fit

Use Nicolas when the alternatives are clear, participants understand the tradeoff, and the group wants a visible record of support, opposition, costs, delegation, and outcome probabilities.

Avoid using it as a symbolic survey after a decision is already made, a statutory election system, or a substitute for legal, procurement, or identity-verification requirements.

FAQ

What kinds of groups is Nicolas for?

Nicolas fits teams, communities, governance groups, and member-led organizations that need to measure preference intensity across clear alternatives.

Are these pages generated from interchangeable templates?

No. The use-case pages share a structure, but each page describes a distinct decision context, fit criteria, limitations, and Nicolas workflow.

Does Nicolas fit every group decision?

No. Nicolas is most useful when intensity, delegation, and transparent cost accounting matter. Simple operational decisions may not need a quadratic voting mechanism.