A decision process with measurable conviction
Nicolas gives each participant a voice budget, which they spend across alternatives with support or opposition intensities so strong preferences become visible without being treated as equally intense.
The result is a structured decision record covering the agenda, participants, vote intensities, aggregate support, outcome probabilities, and quadratic costs.
Built for groups with delegated expertise
Liquid delegation lets participants route influence through people they trust while preserving a clear voting surface. That matters when decisions span technical, governance, community, or organizational expertise.
Delegation is part of the decision workflow rather than a separate forum, so the final record remains tied to the mechanism that produced it.
Transparent mechanism, explicit limits
Nicolas implements the cost accounting and outcome rule for liquid quadratic voting without claiming to infer hidden utility, guarantee equilibrium behavior in small groups, or replace legal election infrastructure.
That explicit boundary is intentional. A useful decision tool makes its mathematical assumptions inspectable instead of hiding them behind a black-box score.